Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:

A lot of mean ol' nasty things have been said by liberals
on these boards, and have compelled conservatives here
to make a response.
There are only about six liberals on these boards that I
have a consistent problem with, in their one-sided and
vicious attacks on conservatives. And then they have the
balls to call myself, G-man, Mr JLA and others "immature"
and "name-callers" for specifically answering the partisan
venom you, Whomod, and a few others post.

You post stuff to the effect of saying: Republicans are
assholes.

And we generally respond saying: Here are links to the
facts that disprove the slanderous spin you allege
to be true.
So based on your false liberal allegations, you jerks are
the assholes you allege us to be.

If that's immature, then you might do well to ask: who
launched the first salvo?
Whenever possible, I try to refrain from insults and just
answer the issues raised.
But once again, right here in this latest round YOU are
personalizing it and won't let it go, and forcing me into
another round of response.
I try to always respond politely, but I get tired of the
personal attacks, and my patience has limits, like
everyone else's.



Ok. Please let me know where I've posted all this slander and hate against conservatives. I post news A LOT, and I give my opinion sometimes, but where have I said mean things about conservatives?

Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:
So if I call you an asshole for baiting me into a flame-
war, and for then further insulting me for responding at
length to the issues that YOU RAISED, then pardon
me for calling you the raging troll asshole that you have
demonstrated yourself to be.

Again, I didn't start this flame-war, I was baited into it
by you, Jim Jackson and Whomod, which is the consistent
pattern. I try to respond minimally to it when possible,
if you'd just let it go !



Calling me a raging troll asshole is a minimal response?

Anywho, all I did is quote this...

Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:

The Democrats have exploited far more. Far more divisively, far more bitterly, and with far less evidence.



And ask "Then how do you know all this?" It's not libel or an insult. It's just that this statement you posted didn't make sense to me at first. When I first read it, it looked like you were saying that Democrats leave behind less evidence, which made me wonder how you could then know that we've "exploited far more." Now I read it to mean that we have far less evidence to exploit with. If that's true, then I see your logic, though I don't think that's true. All I was doing was asking for clarification. Not "trolling."

Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:
I find that hard to believe, considering the relentless
antagonism you provide here in response to virtually every
topic I post to.

I'm a pretty forgiving guy, but I don't treat people who
constantly misrepresent me and constantly launch personal
atrtacks on me like they're my friends.



Please post examples of this relentless antagonism. If you mean that I disagree with you, then you're basically faulting me for posting my own opinions to the same topics to which you post your opinions. If I've posted relentless antagonisms toward you, specifically, then let me know.

Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:
I tried in my above post to just respond with the facts in
a prior link and my previous posted comments, but you
still had to further bait me with more insulting personal
remarks.

Your immaturity and insults are on display here.
I tried to take the high road, and just post facts to
disprove the "no Osama/Saddam link" you allege, without
responsing to your personal insults.



I said you guys often resort to name-calling, and that I often find it annoying. If you take that as an insult or name-calling in itself, then so be it. I think name-calling is childish and stupid. Doesn't matter who insults who first, answering name-calling with name-calling is just as bad, in my opinion.

For the record, I think good arguments have been posted by both sides on many issues. It's not the opinions I have a problem with, it's the slander that follows from both sides.

Also, where have I "alleged" that there was no Osama/Saddam link? It's not in this thread or the "Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein were gay lovers" thread (I love that title, by the way). I haven't even posted to that other thread.

Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:

I respond exactly as long as is required to disprove the
false allegations that YOU RAISED !



What false allegations? I asked how you could know the Democrats have exploited far more, because, at worst, I misread the statement. Where is the allegation in that?


Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:
As I said, I'm just responding to the points raised. If I
respond briefly, I'm accused of "not backing up" what I
say.

If I give links and detailed answers, then I'm accused
of boring you with long-winded answers.

So... I'm damned either way by your hostile partisan
liberal crap.



No venom there.

I'll give you some of that, though. I'd bet you have been accused of not backing yourself up. I don't say that because you don't, but because long posts like the one I've noted seem to have become par.

I never said you bore me. If you did, we wouldn't be having this back and forth. I said I'm not going to read something so long in the first place.

As far as it being "hostile partisan liberal crap" posting long isn't a conservatives-only trait, and I never said it was. And my earlier "hostility" pointed out whomod as well, who you've already counted as a liberal.

I think you're seeing everything I say as a liberal as broad-sweepingly anti-conservative, when that's just not the case.

Quote:

Dave the Wonder Boy said:
You guys post the angry baiting crap, and I try to politely
answer your points while ignoring your antagonism.

And then I'm vilified for even responding politely !

Just amazing...


What I said doesn't villify you. It complains that your posts are too long, but it doesn't villify you. And where, exactly, do you see that I am angry? Annoyed? Yes. Angry? No.