It's hard to tell from the "thrown-togetherness" of that post, but I think you just tried to derail my point.
Eh. Whatever. You're still on the defensive with that "inadaqcuecies in Creationism" comment. And that speaks vloumes. So I'm heartened anyway.
Do you genuinely think Creationism should be taught in a Science cirriculum?
There are reputable scientists who disagree with Darwinian Evolutionary Theory. There are other theories of evolution than Darwin's. If an evolutionary theory passes muster as a scientific theory, I'm all for its inclusion in a cirriculum.
My focus in this thread is not to pit Darwinian Evolution against Creationism as if those two positions are the only theories of the development/relationship of species. My concern in this thread is about the scientific validity of Creationism and the teaching of Creationism as if has scientific merit.
It certainly has philosphical merit and I have no problem with its inclusion somewhere else in a cirriculum.
