I also want to go over the morality of animal killing for consumption.
The main argument against animal killing for consumption is that we're more civilized. But I find that this, at the same time, is contradicted by the fact that the people who make the argument carry the belief that we are on the same field of evolutionary stances with them (i.e. animals and humans alike are equal). So it is in this that I find the argument paradoxal. If we're equal, that means we go off of the same instinct, "the strong survive". And until we remove the innards of all human society, that motto isn't going to change for us either. By principle and circumstance, we are justified to eat meat.
Again, I'm only addressing this commonly used tune.
