Quote:
wannabuyamonkey said:
True, but it's also shorter than. "Flaws in the arceological findings that attemt to prove the yet unproven theory of evolution wich solely as a theory has no inherant flaw, but has yet to clear some distict hurdles in the demonstration process"
Some people choose brevity over technicall perfection.
Yes, that is shorter. However, I wasn't suggesting an alternate thread-title, just an acknowledgement of what the actual content of the inital post was. That way, perhaps there wouldn't have been so many pages wasted arguing over whether or not evolution could be "proven", or whether or not a theory could have a "flaw".
MisterJLA is RACKing awesome.
| 
