Did you make any kind of point there other than trying to insult me?
When I say that an argument is ignorant, I mean just that. That it is ignorant to specific facts. When one argues against intellegent design by siting micro evolution they are clearly ignorant to the fact that intellegent design theory accepts micro-evolution as fact and rebuts only macro evolution. There are many arguments that while I dissagree with are clearly not ignorant. However most arguments I hear opposed to intellegent design come across as ignorant to what intellegent design theory acctually claims.
