Quote: r3x29yz4a said: last I heard there still was no DEFINITIVE proof that he was real beyond biblical texts.
And history that far back can be sketchy. Given how he was treated by the Romans and how history skews things, in 2000 years Christians may mention David Koresh as the second coming.
In other words, you haven't managed to produce any conclusive evidence to support your challenge to what's been established, and you're trying to shove the burden of proof onto your opposition.
And I highly doubt Christians will be accepting David Koresh as anything other than a heretical nutcase who got what he had coming in the near future. Of course, I'm only saying that because, you know, I have familiarity with Christian theology. Not that that gives me any more authority to speak on this than you or anything.
