the "gay agenda" is simply about wanting the freedom to be, to marry , to love without discrimination or inequality. And without condemnation.
Pariah's agenda on the other hand is all about judgement and inequality.
Under those circumstances, who in their right mind would want "understand" their viewpoints? Especially when it's almost exclusively non-gay people telling gay people what they feel and what their desires are and are not and speaking as if it's infallible truth simply because some nomads 5000 years ago declared it to be so.
I dunno..... If Pariah said that left handed people were displeasing to God and should be shunned and spoke with great authority about how it was unnatural, would you be so quick to try to "understand" his point of view?
That's some nice ad hominem there, "Pariah's agenda on the other hand is all about judgement and inequality."
"Left-handed people" and "nomads". Intersting analogies.
Quote: On page 4, there was an article regarding how gay people's brains react to scent in the same manner as women do. Well worth reading if not well worth attacking the science....
I don't usually bother with the articles you post Whomod, because as per usual, they're the very body of what you intend to be your argument when really it's just someone else's words plastered under a different call-sign. I'll adress your conviction however. I said this in the previous threads on homosexuality and I'll say it now: I'm open to the hypothesis that homosexuals are born with a brain deformation that dictates diverse sexual behavior. I do not, however, see how that changes the issue to a significant degree. From what I can tell, it's all together in the same category of psycological disease, just with a more absolute origin than the idea that homosexuality is an absorbed trait (one I'm a proponent of).
