Pariah, I have to pack moving stuff tonight and don't have the time to read all that right now. I will get back to it shortly, but -after the first few things you wrote- I'd like to clear something up. I am making neither a deductive or conductive argument. I am arguing against various claims against homosexuality (the one I heard personally recently which spurred me to post about penguins was "homosexuality is bad because it is unnatural." This does not mean that my argument for the natural nature of homosexuality has nothing to do with it's moral level. Natural things can't be defined as any one 'good' or 'bad.' It takes further inspection to determine morality of a subject regardless of whether it is a natural occurance or not.).
In my initial post every new paragraph was a new idea -hence making a new paragraph. Sorry for not making that clearer. I thought perhaps that the inconsistancy of 'god's way' versus 'natural' versus 'moralty of minding your own damn business' would have spoken for itself.
I promise to get back to this, maybe later tonight. I'm not sure.
Old men, fear me! You will shatter under my ruthless apathetic assault!
Uschi - 2 Old Men - 0
"I am convinced that this world is of no importance, and that the only people who care about dates are imbeciles and Spanish teachers." -- Jean Arp, 1921
"If Jesus came back and saw what people are doing in his name, he would never never stop throwing up." - Max von Sydow, "Hannah and Her Sisters"
