Quote:

Jim Jackson said:
Quote:

wannabuyamonkey said:
Time and time the fact that hetero-sexual relationships fail is brought up as some sort of defence for your side.




It's more brought up as a reason to shoot down the concept of marriage as some holy union. There's no "sancitity of marriagea" in general among the str8s. As such, we ALL need to NOT look at marriage in religious terms.




To say that there is no sanctity of marraige in str8s is not only an easy way to get your opposition to take a defensive posture it's also not true. For many Marraige is sacred. That being said if society as a whole wants to refute that then they can do it through the legislature. Wich is the right way for it to be done. I'm just suggesting a way of getting a greater number of people to take your side. I'm fully willing to back any mesure that would provide you and a parter every bennifit legally that my wife and I share. All i ask for is a word and that the government not be complicite is the notion that the two types of relationships are the same.


Putting the "fun" back in Fundamentalist Christian Dogma. " I know God exists because WBAM told me so. " - theory9 JLA brand RACK points = 514k