Quote:

the G-man said:
Quote:

the G-man said:
Democratic leaders in Congress lobbed a warning shot Friday at the White House not to launch an attack against Iran without first seeking approval from lawmakers...

if we can't credibly threaten military action, then retarding the Iranians' nuclear progress through diplomacy--which is what the Democrats claim to want--becomes absolutely impossible. You need the carrot and the stick.

If they can't bring themselves to give the President an authorization at this point for an attack on Iran, can the Democratic leadership at least refrain from loudly proclaiming their intention to block it?



And, on the heels of the Democrats preemptive surrender comes the news that Iran is going to assemble thousands of centrifuges, in an underground facility starting next month.

Again, I'm sure the timing is completely coincidental.



Add Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton to the list of Democratic Senators publicly supporting Iran's nuclear bid:

Quote:

Matter-eater Man said:

    It would be a mistake of historical proportion if the administration thought that the 2002 resolution authorizing force against Iraq was a blank check for the use of force against Iran without further Congressional authorization.

    Nor should the president think that the 2002 resolution authorizing force after the terrorist attacks of 9/11 in any way authorizes force against Iran. If the administration believes that any, any use of force against Iran is necessary, the president must come to Congress to seek that authority.


Hillary Clinton



So, now the 2008 Democratic frontrunner has publicly told Iran that Bush may not have the authority to attack them if they continue building a nuclear weapon.

Good show, Hillary.