It doesn't deserve that, in my honest opinion. Since it's a sequel that is piggybacking on the success of Singer's first two movies, I have to compare it to those two; and it just doesn't hold up. Three is in no way better than one for the simple fact that one was the experiment to see what could and could not pass on the big screen. With leasons learned they made two, which is a vastly superior movie. With a two movie foundation, three comes along and makes more mistakes than one did. Action and special effects alone don't make a good movie. Especially when its predecessors made sure to focus on story and characterization.

whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules.
It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness.
This is true both in politics and on the internet."

Our Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man said: "no, the doctor's right. besides, he has seniority."