Quote:

Jim Jackson said:
I disagree. I think there was much to Irwin's approach that *was* disrespectful to animals.

And you're saying Irwin *didn't* want publicity?

Maybe badmouthing the dead imparts lessons to the living. The guy fed a croc with his baby in his arms.



I think the main point is that despite how you feel about how he treated the animals, Irwin wanted publicity for them. He taught conservation and informed people about the creatures he handled to build up knowledge and sympathy for their shrinking numbers and environments. Whatever you feel about his approach, that was his aim. I'm not a 100% sure, but I don't think he ever got rich off of his movies and shows. All that money went back into his zoo and other conservation efforts.

Now, what is the purpose of this reporter's op/ed piece? Is she helping a greater cause? Or is she just trying to steal some thunder from a person's death?

whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules.
It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness.
This is true both in politics and on the internet."

Our Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man said: "no, the doctor's right. besides, he has seniority."