|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 33,385 Likes: 1
Regenerated 15000+ posts
|
Regenerated 15000+ posts
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 33,385 Likes: 1 |
Quote:
Im Not Mister Mxypltk said: Only if the kinda stories you wanna tell are limited to begin with. Who says killing is even gonna be relevant to the stories?
No one. However, I don't think it should be placed as a limitation on the character to the point you have absurd reasons for them not to kill...
Quote:
G-Man said: But no one is holding a gun to your head and telling you, at the approximate age of thirty, to read stories about characters who were created primarily as childrens' stories, regardless of who is writing them. You don't "have" to sift through any writer's work.
And as far as what "modern sensibilities" are, I think that really is a matter of individual preference and the age of the reader involved. When you consider the pacifisitic nature of many people, there are probably as many people who would prefer to see a superhero not kill. In fact, comparing, for example, the average Punisher story to the average Batman story, I think one could legitimately argue there's nothing at all "complex" about a superhero killing his enemies instead of finding other ways to subdue them. Doesn't the fact that Batman lets the Joker live, and the consequents of that, invite a greater level of moral complexity than just killing him outright?
Like I said, I have no problem in the proper format telling "adult" stories with "kids" characters but I think that they should remain, primarily, kid accessible characters.
I'm aware of your opinions on the concept that I...and my opinions...are the downfall of modern comics. And civilization. We've discussed this bit before.
|
|
|
|
|
|