Originally Posted By: Matter-eater Man
So you a partisan conservative have a problem with a site being partisan liberal.

That of course doesn't change that Hillary did indeed do what RAW & pretty much any other major outlet reported. Was there anything that you feel RAW did wrong other than being guilty of being a liberal site?



I think it's the fact that RAW is such a blatantly one-sided source, that always spins things to demonize Republicans, and always spins things to make Democrats look good, or at worst, dredges up Republican abuses to say: There, see, Democrats are only guilty of what Republicans already did.

G-man often posts from sources like the New York Times and Washington Post. Which while these are also arguably liberal-partisan sources, at least will frequently voice criticism of Democrats and expose unethical/criminal behavior of Democrats, as well as that of Republicans.

But RAW is just reliable one-sided propaganda. Excrement.
Manufactured anti-conservative vitriol, served fresh daily.

  • from Do Racists have lower IQ's...

    Liberals who bemoan discrimination, intolerance, restraint of Constitutional freedoms, and promotion of hatred toward various abberant minorities, have absolutely no problem with discriminating against, being intolerant of, restricting Constitutional freedoms of, and directing hate-filled scapegoat rhetoric against conservatives.

    EXACTLY what they accuse Republicans/conservatives of doing, is EXACTLY what liberals/Democrats do themselves, to those who oppose their beliefs.