Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,958
some RKMB'ers are Obsessed with Black People Hmmm?
5000+ posts
some RKMB'ers are Obsessed with Black People Hmmm?
5000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,958
Well as a collector, one has to consider that if there is no market around for comics, then all the comics we've all been hoarding in our garages for decades are not going to appreciate much. Barring a World War III paper drive or something...

I've been predicting the coming comics glut for a while now once the boomers start dying off and their collections resurface in the market.

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 33,385
Likes: 3
Regenerated
15000+ posts
Regenerated
15000+ posts
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 33,385
Likes: 3
 Originally Posted By: First Amongst Daves
And you know what? I like grim 'n' gritty. I love Miller's DKR. I loved Cable's assumption of responsibility for the New Mutants. I like Byrne's Superman, where Luthor had a kryptonite ring and threw Superman out of his office by the scruff of the neck like trash. I thought the Mutant Massacre in X-men in the mid-80s, where Nightcrawler and Colossus were hospitalised, was awesome, and that Wolverine skewered Phoenix rather than let her kill Selene in cold blood. I like the fact that Hal Jordan turned evil, that Aquaman lost a hand, that the Flash died and isn't coming back and that the Anti-Monitor crisped Supergirl. I liked the fact that Hulk broke his leg in Secret Wars. And I liked Batman becoming obsessed with his war on crime.

The writing became exciting. These people with their powers were fighting desperate and evil adversaries. Sometimes bad things happened. And I think comics were better for it.



Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,546
Likes: 1
living in 1962
15000+ posts
living in 1962
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,546
Likes: 1
 Originally Posted By: whomod
 Originally Posted By: Grimm
cuz they average about three to four bucks a pop now?


Yes. And look at all the Archie comics. $2.25 a digest. In each digest, you not only get one complete story, you get several complete stories!

Now is it that big a stretch to think DC can't do this with their back catalog of single/double issue comic stories from the 40's-80's?



we're well aware of that, man. we've rehashed it ad nauseum on here. trust me, in this particular instance, you are talking to the choir.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
 Originally Posted By: Prometheus
 Originally Posted By: First Amongst Daves
And you know what? I like grim 'n' gritty. I love Miller's DKR. I loved Cable's assumption of responsibility for the New Mutants. I like Byrne's Superman, where Luthor had a kryptonite ring and threw Superman out of his office by the scruff of the neck like trash. I thought the Mutant Massacre in X-men in the mid-80s, where Nightcrawler and Colossus were hospitalised, was awesome, and that Wolverine skewered Phoenix rather than let her kill Selene in cold blood. I like the fact that Hal Jordan turned evil, that Aquaman lost a hand, that the Flash died and isn't coming back and that the Anti-Monitor crisped Supergirl. I liked the fact that Hulk broke his leg in Secret Wars. And I liked Batman becoming obsessed with his war on crime.

The writing became exciting. These people with their powers were fighting desperate and evil adversaries. Sometimes bad things happened. And I think comics were better for it.




Well thank fuck someone read it and even better agreed with it.

I'm not excusing the bad writing which also epitomised the grim n gritty 90s period. Alex Ross was right to mock Liefeld in Kingdom Come. Anything which comes out of Image now with a cape is doomed to failure because their currency is worth nothing, when it comes to superheroics and if not for The Authority and access to Jim Lee's pencils Wildstorm would probably be a decision DC would have regretted.

But if not for grim n gritty we'd all be bitching about comics, like we did with Star Wars. We'd have grown out of them. Actually we wouldn't be bitching about them. We wouldn't be reading them.


Pimping my site, again.

http://www.worldcomicbookreview.com

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
My only objection to "grim and gritty" is when it, or any other style, becomes a house style or trend and books that shouldn't follow that trend are forced to do so.

Batman? Give me grim and gritty. Same with Green Arrow, the Question, Daredevil, Punisher, etc.

But not every character should be that way. For example, Superman, Capt. Marvel, maybe FF, all work better IMO, with more of the silver age elements intact.

The bottom line is that the publishers need to take the right approach for each character and not just shoehorn every book into one style or another.

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,353
Award-Winning Author
10000+ posts
Award-Winning Author
10000+ posts
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,353
 Originally Posted By: the G-man
Batman? Give me grim and gritty. Same with Green Arrow, the Question, Daredevil, Punisher, etc.

But not every character should be that way. For example, Superman, Capt. Marvel, maybe FF, all work better IMO, with more of the silver age elements intact.



With the exception of some of the events of Reign of the Supermen, when have they EVER tried to make Superman grim 'n' gritty?


Knutreturns said: Spoken like the true Greatest RDCW Champ!

All hail King Snarf!

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
I didn't say they had made Superman grim and gritty (though, arguably Jim Lee's artwork was a bit on the g&g side, what with his tendency to draw an angry, brooding, Superman with glowing red eyes).

I said he was an example of a character whom I think works better with many of his silver age elements intact, as opposed to some characters who are better off having thrown off those elements. I was saying I didn't want him to go grim and gritty, just because Batman works that way.

Oh, and one clarification/correction. I shouldn't have mentioned Capt. Marvel in that list since he wasn't published in the silver age. But he is an example of a character who works best in a simpler style and tends to lose something whenever they try to modernize him too much.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,546
Likes: 1
living in 1962
15000+ posts
living in 1962
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,546
Likes: 1
 Originally Posted By: First Amongst Daves
 Originally Posted By: Prometheus
 Originally Posted By: First Amongst Daves
And you know what? I like grim 'n' gritty. I love Miller's DKR. I loved Cable's assumption of responsibility for the New Mutants. I like Byrne's Superman, where Luthor had a kryptonite ring and threw Superman out of his office by the scruff of the neck like trash. I thought the Mutant Massacre in X-men in the mid-80s, where Nightcrawler and Colossus were hospitalised, was awesome, and that Wolverine skewered Phoenix rather than let her kill Selene in cold blood. I like the fact that Hal Jordan turned evil, that Aquaman lost a hand, that the Flash died and isn't coming back and that the Anti-Monitor crisped Supergirl. I liked the fact that Hulk broke his leg in Secret Wars. And I liked Batman becoming obsessed with his war on crime.

The writing became exciting. These people with their powers were fighting desperate and evil adversaries. Sometimes bad things happened. And I think comics were better for it.




Well thank fuck someone read it and even better agreed with it.

I'm not excusing the bad writing which also epitomised the grim n gritty 90s period. Alex Ross was right to mock Liefeld in Kingdom Come. Anything which comes out of Image now with a cape is doomed to failure because their currency is worth nothing, when it comes to superheroics and if not for The Authority and access to Jim Lee's pencils Wildstorm would probably be a decision DC would have regretted.

But if not for grim n gritty we'd all be bitching about comics, like we did with Star Wars. We'd have grown out of them. Actually we wouldn't be bitching about them. We wouldn't be reading them.


actually, I think Invincible sells pretty well, but other than that and maybe Godland I can't come up with anything off the top of my head.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
 Originally Posted By: King Snarf
 Originally Posted By: the G-man
Batman? Give me grim and gritty. Same with Green Arrow, the Question, Daredevil, Punisher, etc.

But not every character should be that way. For example, Superman, Capt. Marvel, maybe FF, all work better IMO, with more of the silver age elements intact.



With the exception of some of the events of Reign of the Supermen, when have they EVER tried to make Superman grim 'n' gritty?


Byrne's two year run on Superman. Lex puts Supes through the mill. Metallo almost kills Supes, first issue, save that Lex's ego can't handle someone else killing Superman. Lana Lang is tortured by Lex's goons, second issue. And in the final issues, parallel Earth Kryptonians utterly destroy an Earth, incinerate Supergirl, kill Oliver Queen, Bruce Wayne and Hal Jordan, and are then executed with green K by Superman. It was a brutal time in Superman. It was when Byrne was top of his game, and I have had no inclination to read a single Superman issue since (because with the exception of Maxima, which was a good idea, clones, nervous breakdowns, not-quite deaths, and marriage to Lois all left me cold).


Pimping my site, again.

http://www.worldcomicbookreview.com

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 24,593
Timelord. Drunkard.
15000+ posts
Timelord. Drunkard.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 24,593
I gotta agree with Dave on this. The original Superman was a bit grim and gritty too. And, quite frankly, I don't like the Silver Age Superman as a character. He's a bit of a douche.


whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules.
It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness.
This is true both in politics and on the internet."

Our Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man said: "no, the doctor's right. besides, he has seniority."
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Banned from the DCMBs since 2002.
15000+ posts
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,367
Likes: 13
 Originally Posted By: thedoctor
I gotta agree with Dave on this. The original Superman was a bit grim and gritty too. And, quite frankly, I don't like the Silver Age Superman as a character. He's a bit of a douche.


Yeah, you know, the first Superman story reads pretty well given how old it is. He's not referred to as "Superman", he's referred to as "Kent", and operates in an almost cladestine manner, sneaking around to gather intel, not the big bright world-rescuing symbol at all.


Pimping my site, again.

http://www.worldcomicbookreview.com

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Officially "too old for this shit"
15000+ posts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 43,952
Likes: 6
 Originally Posted By: thedoctor
...quite frankly, I don't like the Silver Age Superman as a character. He's a bit of a douche.


That's an interesting point (and, of course, the whole basis for the Superdickery website). As noted above, however:

 Originally Posted By: the G-man

Most of us recognize that the silver age was flawed and most of old time fans don't really want a return to that era. We don't want a Batman who acts like Adam West. We don't want simplistic stories that only last eight pages. But we do like the idea of taking what works in a modern age (better characterization, better logic, better art) and maybe, just maybe, making more comics that are, like the ones in the Silver Age, fun to read and even capable of attracting new readers, instead of catering to an ever shrinking readership that needs to be exposed to even more "shocking" moments to rouse themselves from their comics reading ennui

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0