Originally Posted By: whomod
Maybe if the NY Times had been as specific with Hillary's "handful" of districts as they were specific about Obama's "80" then maybe it would have warranted being included.


It would be nice to know what a handful actually is. It's rather poor form on the writer's part to give a hard number for Obama & then leave us with only the word "handful" for Hillary.

These were unofficial tallies btw & so far the difference is statistically so small it hasn't changed the results at all. Not sure if this rates much Hillary hate.

Fair play!