Originally Posted By: Halo82
 Quote:
You are so goddamn, fucking stupid. Did they not teach you to read in that inbred camp of carny folk you come from? Didn't you see where I said that the most scientific research into Iraqi casualties has the number at less than half of what you quoted?


First of all, I never quoted an actual body count you stupid son of a bitch. I just said "400,000 troops plus Iraqi casualties". Therefore your point is not only irrelevant is stupid. What makes you think your sources of info are so much better than everyone else's?


If you're not getting that number from somewhere, does that mean that you're admitting to making it up?

As I've said, the ones who're putting out the 400,000 number are using methods that are really just knocking on doors and asking people how many people have died. The numbers I've put out are made by confirmed deaths using Iraqi morgues and death certificates. Not 100% accurate, but more accurate than 400,000.

 Originally Posted By: Halo82
No, dummy, I didn't say your opinion doesn't matter just the issues. All that other stuff isn't as important the Iraq issue.


Odd. Most Americans believe that the economy is the most important issue in this election. Are you going to tell them that they're wrong? Once again, don't assert your opinion as fact or the end-all-be-all of every conversation.

whomod said: I generally don't like it when people decide to play by the rules against people who don't play by the rules.
It tends to put you immediately at a disadvantage and IMO is a sign of true weakness.
This is true both in politics and on the internet."

Our Friendly Neighborhood Ray-man said: "no, the doctor's right. besides, he has seniority."